Legal Opinion

State v. Rodriquez

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 24, 1986No. 64775PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

500 So.2d 120 (1986)

STATE of Florida, Petitioner,

v.

Rene Ramous RODRIQUEZ, Respondent.

No. 64775.

Supreme Court of Florida.

December 24, 1986.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and W. Brian Bayly, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for petitioner.

No Appearance, for respondent.

BOYD, Justice.

This cause is before the Court on the petition of the State of Florida for review of the decision of the district court of appeal reported as Rodriquez v. State, 443 So.2d 236 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). The decision of the district court conflicts with decisions of this Court. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

Res…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent · Overton; Dissent · Overton.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Carawan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  3. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  4. Sirmons v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  5. Barton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API