Legal Opinion

Bayer v. PAL Newcomb Partners

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 2002No. NonePublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORS, Acting Justice.

[¶ 1.] PAL, Inc., (PAL) appeals a money judgment in favor of Barry and Sylvia Bayer and Three B, Inc. based on negligent misrepresentation. We reverse.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] River Run was a Planned Development District in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, located next to Westward Ho Country Club. West 12th Street ran along the northern boundary. Gage Brothers Concrete was located next to Interstate 29 on the west. Wooded land owned by the City of Sioux Falls bordered the Sioux River to the east.

[¶ 3.] River Run was originally farmland owned by the Newcomb family. Development efforts in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Hydro Investors, Inc. v. Trafalgar Power Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  3. Aschoff v. Mobil Oil Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Mid-Century Insurance Co. v. LyonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Fields v. Melrose Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hanson v. VERMILLION SCHOOL DISTRICT 13-1South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Cohen v. Northwestern Growth Corp.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2005
  3. Steineke v. DelzerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Equipment Service Professionals v. DenowhSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. ABIRA MEDICAL LABORATORIES, LLC v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of The Mid-Atlantic States, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API