Legal Opinion

Ring v. Patterson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1931PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Section 65-302, Oregon Code 1930, makes provision for the appointment by the governor of three pilot commissioners, and section 65-312 provides that it shall be the duty of the Board “to maintain a sufficient number of pilots upon the bar and river pilot ground to meet the demands of commerce”, and that the Board shall (1) “examine and license pilots for said pilot grounds; (2) hear and determine all complaints against any of said pilots; (3) make and alter rules for the government of such pilots and the maintenance of an efficient pilot service on the pilot grounds aforesaid * * * and to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. New York Ex Rel. Lieberman v. Van De CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Clark v. RossierIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
  3. State ex rel. Granville v. GregorySupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  4. Ewbank v. Turner.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  5. State v. BriggsOregon Supreme Court · 1904

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Feves v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1971
  2. State v. TourtillotOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. TourtillottOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Milwaukie Co. of Jehovah's Witnesses v. MullenOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Rogue River Packing Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API