Maxfield v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HEALY, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Maxfield and Wilton were jointly charged in two indictments, each of which contained four counts. The first three counts of one indictment charged them with willfully attempting to evade payment of Maxfield’s income taxes for the years 1935, 1936, and 1937, in violation of § 145(b) of the Revenue Acts of 1934 and 1936, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Code, § 145(b). The companion counts of the other indictment charged a willful attempt on the part of both to evade Wilton’s income taxes for those years. The fourth count charged the. two with conspiring with each other, each…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Hirabayashi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Himmelfarb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- United States v. Hilda Escobar De BrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Remmer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Fredrick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- People ex rel. Maurer v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.