Legal Opinion

Meade v. Florida Infusion Services, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 6, 2000No. 2:00-cv-00821PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOYNER, District Judge.

This case has been brought before the Court on Motion of the Defendant-Coun-terclaimant Florida Infusion Services, Inc. for summary judgment on both the Plaintiffs complaint for declaratory judgment and its counterclaim for judgment on the commercial promissory note and guaranty agreement which plaintiff and her husband executed in defendant’s favor on August 24, 1999. For the reasons which follow, the motion shall be denied.

Factual Background

Both Plaintiff, Bernadette Meade and her husband, Third-Party Defendant Keith Mills, are physicians…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Williams v. Borough of West ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  3. Liberty Lobby, Inc. v. Dow Jones & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. Kensington HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Schillachi v. Flying Dutchman Motorcycle ClubDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Molly L. Ex Rel. B.L. v. Lower Merion School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API