Legal Opinion

Hanlon v. Hennessy

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 7, 1902No. Nos. 13,171-(51)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by defendant Dennis Hennessy from a judgment of the district court for Stevens county, entered pursuant to the findings and order of Steidl, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This action was brought in justice court to recover against defendants jointly an amount claimed to be due plaintiff for work and labor. Plaintiff had judgment, and defendant Hennessy ap*354pealed to the district court upon questions of law alone, where the judgment of the justice was affirmed, and he again appealed to1 this court.

But one question is presented for our consideration, and that goes to the sufficiency, in respect to form and contents, of the judgment rendered by the justice. The judgment, as appears from his docket, is in the following language:

“I enter judgment, and judgment is now…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clark v. Gaar, Scott & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1901

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. John Wright & Associates, Inc. v. City of Red WingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. John Wright & Associates, Inc. v. City of Red WingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API