Legal Opinion

Clark v. Gaar, Scott & Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 1, 1901No. Nos. 12,711—(58)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action in the municipal court of Minneapolis to recover $812.50, with interest, as commissions under a contract. The case was: tried before Holt, J., who found in favor of plaintiff for the sum demanded. From a judgment entered pursuant to the findings, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.

Action on five commission certificates issued to the firm of Clark & Lageson to.pay for services in the sale of a threshing machine, separator, and stacker. • The certificates were after-wards assigned to plaintiff, who brought action thereon in the municipal court of Minneapolis, wherein the same was tried without a jury. Findings were duly made- and- judgment ordered for plaintiff for the amount claimed. Defendant appeals from the judgment.

The facts in this case may be better understood by reference to a former decision of this court (Clark v. Gaar, Scott & Co., 78 Minn. 192, 81 N. W. 530),…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clark v. Gaar, Scott & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  2. Miller v. SellwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hanlon v. HennessySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API