Legal Opinion

Bigelow v. Merz

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 5, 1922No. Civ. No. 4211PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This action was brought to enjoin the defendant from interfering with the flow of water from his land to that of the plaintiffs. The complaint set forth that the plaintiffs and the defendant were the owners of lands riparian to a stream of water having its source in springs situated upon certain described land and upon the land of the defendant, and flowing thence down to and upon the plaintiffs’ lands; that said plaintiffs had for a number of years used a specified amount of the water of said stream for domestic purposes and for irrigation, and that it was necessary that they have the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Crim v. KessingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Bathgate v. IrvineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Benton v. JohncoxWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Duckworth v. Watsonville Water & Light Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Hargrave v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Omnes v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API