Budget Dress Corp. v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
RYAN, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff moves, pursuant to Rule 12(f) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C. A., “to strike as much of the answers of the defendants herein, as the same are insufficient, redundant, immaterial, impertinent and scandalous.”
The complaint alleges that certain acts of the defendants constitute a conspiracy in restraint of trade in violation of the Sherman and Clayton Acts. Plaintiff seeks an injunction and a money judgment for treble damages in the sum of $1,050,000.
The essential facts in this controversy are set forth in our earlier opinion denying plaintiff’s motion for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Milgram v. Loew's, Inc. (Hamilton Street Realty Company, Intervenors)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Tivoli Realty, Inc. v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1948
- Trebuhs Realty Co. v. News Syndicate Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Smith v. Piper Aircraft Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Stone v. Arizona Highway CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Garza v. Chicago Health Clubs, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
- Salcer v. Envicon Equities Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Smith, Kline & French Laboratories v. A. H. Robins Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Riverton Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.