Legal Opinion
State v. Medrano
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided December 4, 1992No. 19234PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SILAK, Judge.
Appellant, Ralph Medrano, was charged with and found guilty by a jury of first-degree kidnapping. I.C. § 18-4502. Medrano was sentenced to an indeterminate term of life, with a fixed term in prison of eighteen years. At trial the court denied a motion to suppress the testimony of law enforcement personnel on the grounds that the motion was untimely under I.C.R. 12(d). The court overruled Medrano’s further objection that the testimony of the law enforcement personnel should be excluded because he was not given warnings required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 444, 86 S.Ct.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State v. AtkinsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. ThompsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. KuzmichevIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. MedinaIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. BirklaIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.