Legal Opinion
Newsome v. Administrative Office of the Courts of New Jersey
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 5, 2000No. Civ.A. 97-3213 (JAG)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
GREENAWAY, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are defendants’ motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff Gaye Newsome alleges that she was sexually harassed by her supervisor, defendant William Coleman, during her tenure at defendant Administrative Office of the Courts (“AOC”), in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”), the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination, N.J.S.A. §§ 10:5-1 et seq. (“LAD”), and state tort law. 1 For the reasons discussed below, defendants’ motions are granted in part and denied in part.
FACTS
The…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Gerard Cardenas v. Jon Massey James Rebo Robert Lipscher James Ciancia Deborah Poritz State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Leslie Kohler,plaintiff-Appellant v. Inter-Tel Technologies,defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Hargrave v. County of AtlanticDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- Godfrey v. Princeton Theological SeminarySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
- Gaines v. BellinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.