Legal Opinion

Khan v. Popeyes of Maryland, Inc.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided January 4, 2002No. Civ. H-01-1478PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HARVEY, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff Zafar Khan (“Khan”), is a 56 year old Muslim 1 who was formerly employed by defendant Popeyes of Maryland, Inc. (“Popeyes”) for a short period of time as a trainee. Proceeding pro se, plaintiff has paid the filing fee and has filed a complaint in this Court on a form furnished by the Clerk. Suit has been brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. (“Title VII”) and under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. § 621, et seq. (the “ADEA”).

In his complaint, plaintiff…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mousa v. Lauda Air Luftfahrt, A.G.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API