Legal Opinion

Vann v. Dow Chemical Co.

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided March 21, 1983No. Civ. 82-1129PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

H. FRANKLIN WATERS, Chief Judge.

Introduction

On October 14, 1982, plaintiffs instituted this action against defendant, The Dow Chemical Company (hereinafter “Dow”), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332, alleging that plaintiffs, Stuart Vann, William Joe Wallace, Jr., Billy Hendricks, Thomas Pyle and William Joe Wallace, Sr., while employees and employees of independent contractors of Dow, were allowed to come into contact with Dibromoehloropropane, Ethylene Di-bromide and Bromine (hereinafter “DBCP”) without warning and without proper safety apparatus. Plaintiffs allege that they now…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Heskett v. Fisher Laundry & Cleaners Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  2. Juanita Robinson v. Mfa Mutual Insurance Company and Countryside Casualty Company D/B/A Mfa Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  3. Griffin v. George's, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  4. Braman and the Gus Blass Co. v. WalthallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  5. Bibler Bros. v. IngramSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. Ensco, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  2. Beshears v. Pilgrim's Pride Corp.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2013
  3. Riverside Furniture Corp. v. RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API