State v. Hoth
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, J.
The defendant, Craig Hoth, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a (a).1 On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court *79improperly (1) denied his motion to suppress evidence derived from a warrantless entry into the home he shared with the victim pursuant to the emergency exception to the warrant requirements of both the federal and state constitutions and (2) admitted hearsay evidence concerning a statement the victim made to a witness. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. DeneuiSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. StevensonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- State v. Hoa Van NguyenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- State v. MontiniConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Thomsen v. Aqua Massage International, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.