Legal Opinion
AMGEN INC. v. SAMSUNG BIOEPIS CO., LTD.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 24, 2025No. 1:24-cv-08417Unknown
1Opinion
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE AMGEN INC., et al., Civil No. 24-8417 (CPO/EAP) Plaintiffs, v. SAMSUNG BIOEPIS CO., LTD., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM ORDER This matter having come before the Court on non-parties Celltrion, Inc. and Celltrion USA, Inc.’s (collectively, “Celltrion”) letter motion for a protective order (“Celltrion Mot.”),1 ECF No. 157; and Defendant Samsung Bioepis (“Samsung”) having filed opposition (“Samsung Resp.”), ECF No. 162; and Celltrion having filed a reply brief, ECF No. 168, and the Court having considered the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In re: Avandia Marketing v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Micro Motion, Incorporated v. Kane Steel Co., Inc., Cross/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Pansy v. Borough of StroudsburgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- LEAP Systems, Inc. v. MoneyTrax, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Mylan Inc. v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.