Legal Opinion

Marilyn Centanni v. Eight Unknown Officers

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 3, 1994No. 92-4331PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge.

Defendants-Appellants Eight Unknown Officers (“the Officers”) appeal the district court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment on their claim of qualified immunity from Plaintiff-Appellee Marilyn Centan-ni’s section 1983 lawsuit alleging that they violated her Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

I

Shortly before midnight on February 19, 1991, the victim of a shooting incident entered the Walton Hills (Ohio) Police Department and identified his assailant as Nicholas…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Katherine Gardenhire and Walter Gardenhire v. Donald Schubert, in His Individual and Official Capacity as Chief of PoliceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  2. Russell Marcilis, II v. Township of RedfordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. Luis Lopez-MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  4. Torre S. Crockett Dushon L. Greene v. Cumberland College Michael B. Colegrove K. David Kersey, City of Williamsburg, Kentucky Don HamlinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  5. James E. McCurdy v. Montgomery County, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API