Legal Opinion
Davis v. Kittle Manufacturing Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 21, 1933No. Docket No. 4741PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, J., pro tem.
By this action plaintiff seeks to recover damages arising out of the breach of a contract to pay royalties due from the manufacture and sale of camp beds alleged to have been invented by him. Trial was had by the court, and the judgment in the sum of $16,295.04 was rendered in favor of plaintiff. Defendant now appeals from this judgment.
For his first cause of action plaintiff alleges in his complaint the execution of the following contract between him and defendant:
“This Agreement, made and entered into in duplicate at Los Angeles, California, this 2nd day of March, 1923,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nash v. LullMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Brush Electric Co. v. California Electric Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1892
- Hamilton v. Park & McKay Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hunter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Sinclair v. Aquarius Electronics, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1974
- Republic Pictures Corp. v. Security-First Nat. Bank of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
- Kittle Manufacturing Co. v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Seagren v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.