Legal Opinion
McKinney v. Hanks
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided December 20, 1995No. 3:95-cv-0610 AS, 3:95-cv-0642 ASPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ALLEN SHARP, Chief Judge.
I. PRELUDE
Many United States district judges and United States magistrate judges who must work daily in the trenches of the federal trial judiciary, dealing with the current massive flow of pro se prisoner cases brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging the decisions of prison disciplinary boards, are most respectfully concerned about the newly created boundaries found in Sandin v. Conner, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 2293, 132 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995). 1 One is reminded by the sugges tion earlier in this century by G.K. Chesterton that a fence should not be…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stone-Bey v. BarnesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1996
- Bonner v. ParkeDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1996
- Hester v. McBrideDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1997
- Hayes v. McBrideDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1997
- Rowold v. McBrideDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.