Legal Opinion

NXP B.V. v. Blackberry, Ltd.

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided October 21, 2014No. 6:12-cv-00498-YKPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

YVETTE KANE, District Judge.

Defendants BlackBerry Limited and BlackBerry Corporation (Defendants or “BlackBerry”) move the Court to declare the above-captioned action “exceptional” and order an award of attorneys’ fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285. (Doc. No. 527.) Plaintiff NXP B.V. (Plaintiff or “NXP”) opposes the motion. For the reasons that follow, the Court will deny Defendants’ motion.-

I. BACKGROUND

On April 12, 2012, NXP filed a complaint in this Court, alleging that BlackBerry had infringed six of their U.S. patents. (Doc. No. 1.) After receiving Defendants’ invalidity…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Brooks Furniture Manufacturing, Inc. v. Dutailier International, Inc. And Dutailier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  5. Sulzer Textil A.G. And Sulzer Textile, Inc. v. Picanol N v. Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shipping & Transit, LLC v. 1A Auto, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API