Legal Opinion
State v. Hill
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided August 10, 2011No. 4867PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
Pursuant to Anders v. California 1 Jonathan K. Hill (Hill) appeals his convictions for two counts of armed robbery, two counts of conspiracy to commit armed robbery, and one count of resisting arrest. 2 After review, this court ordered the parties to brief the issue of whether the circuit court erred in denying Hill’s motion for a new trial after the jury mistakenly received two statements made by Hill during deliberations that were not admitted into evidence during trial. We find the circuit court erred and accordingly reverse.
FACTS
On the evening of January 31, 2002, and the early morning…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. BaccusSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- State v. BelcherSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- State v. KellySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lynel Witherspoon v. Donnie StonebreakerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- Lynel Witherspoon v. Donnie StonebreakerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022