Legal Opinion

Concerning the Application for Plan for Augmentation of the City & County of Denver Ex Rel. Board of Water Commissioners v. City & County of Denver

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 29, 2002No. 00SA302PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Martinez

The City of Thornton ("Thornton") appeals the order of the District Court for Water Division No. 1 ("water court") denying Thornton's petition to extend the period of retained jurisdiction, see § 37-92-804(6), 10 C.R.S. (2001), agreed to by Thornton and the City and County of Denver, acting by and through its Board of Water Commissioners ("Denver"), in a stipulated decree later approved by the water court. Thornton filed a timely petition seeking to invoke the retained Jurisdiction provision. The petition requested that the water court reconsider its finding of non-injury to Thornton and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. Coffin v. Left Hand Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1882
  3. Danielson v. Castle Meadows, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  4. City of Florence v. Board of Waterworks of PuebloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  5. Brighton Ditch Co. v. City of EnglewoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Well Augmentation Subdistrict of Central Colorado Water Conservancy District v. City of AuroraSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  2. Buffalo Park Development Co. v. Mountain Mutual Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  3. Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority v. WolfeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  4. Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  5. Coors Brewing Co. v. City of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API