Legal Opinion

White Line Taxi & Transfer Co. v. Borough of South Brownsville

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1927No. Appeal 145PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

The question raised by this appeal is whether a borough may legally impose by ordinance a license fee for the operation of a motor vehicle of a common carrier — in this instance, a motor bus duly licensed by the State Highway Department and under the regulation of the Public Service Commission — used for the purpose of carrying passengers for hire in or through said borough.

It was decided in Borough of Applewold v. Dosch, 239 Pa. 479, that under the legislation then existing a borough might, by ordinance, impose a license tax upon a motor vehicle used in carrying persons…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Borough of Applewold v. DoschSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. White Line Taxi & Transfer Co. v. South Brownsville BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Chester City v. Bostwick, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1930
  3. Commonwealth v. ZahniserCentre County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1938
  4. New Jersey Interurban Coach Co. v. City of Easton, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API