Smith v. Howard
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KEETON, Justice.
This action was brought by respondents, owners of a two-thirds interest in certain improved real estate to have the property sold, the proceeds from the sale distributed and paid to the parties entitled thereto. Appellants Howard and wife own a one-third interest. The property cannot be partitioned without injury to the owners.
Appellants filed a cross-complaint alleging that the improvements on the premises enhanced the value $20,000 and that they advanced $9,705.11 to construct such improvements; that $9,000 was furnished by funds other than those furnished by appellants. It…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ridgeway v. LoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. KysarIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
- Hurst v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Adams v. JarvisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Dunn v. WardIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
- Smith v. Idaho State University Federal Credit UnionIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.