Legal Opinion

Smith v. Howard

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1955No. 8154PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEETON, Justice.

This action was brought by respondents, owners of a two-thirds interest in certain improved real estate to have the property sold, the proceeds from the sale distributed and paid to the parties entitled thereto. Appellants Howard and wife own a one-third interest. The property cannot be partitioned without injury to the owners.

Appellants filed a cross-complaint alleging that the improvements on the premises enhanced the value $20,000 and that they advanced $9,705.11 to construct such improvements; that $9,000 was furnished by funds other than those furnished by appellants. It…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ridgeway v. LoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. KysarIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Hurst v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  3. Adams v. JarvisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Dunn v. WardIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Smith v. Idaho State University Federal Credit UnionIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API