State v. Valencia
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ESPINOSA, Judge:
¶ 1 Gregory Valencia Jr. and Joey Healer seek review of trial court orders denying their respective petitions for post-conviction relief, in which they argued Miller v. Alabama, - U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012), constitutes a significant change in the law applicable to their natural-life prison sentences. Because Miller, as clarified by the United States Supreme Court in Montgomery v. Louisiana, — U.S. -, -, 136 S.Ct. 718, 734, 193 L.Ed.2d 599 (2016), “bar[s] life without parole” for all juvenile offenders except those “whose crimes reflect permanent…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Montgomery v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Thompson v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. GreenwayArizona Supreme Court · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State of Arizona v. valencia/healerArizona Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. HealerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- Click v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2016
- Cruz 164127 v. ThornellDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- State of Arizona v. valencia/healerArizona Supreme Court · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.