Legal Opinion

State v. Valencia

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 28, 2016No. Nos. 2 CA-CR 2015-0151-PR, 2 CA-CR 2015-0182-PRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ESPINOSA, Judge:

¶ 1 Gregory Valencia Jr. and Joey Healer seek review of trial court orders denying their respective petitions for post-conviction relief, in which they argued Miller v. Alabama, - U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012), constitutes a significant change in the law applicable to their natural-life prison sentences. Because Miller, as clarified by the United States Supreme Court in Montgomery v. Louisiana, — U.S. -, -, 136 S.Ct. 718, 734, 193 L.Ed.2d 599 (2016), “bar[s] life without parole” for all juvenile offenders except those “whose crimes reflect permanent…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Montgomery v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Thompson v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. State v. GreenwayArizona Supreme Court · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. valencia/healerArizona Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. HealerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  3. Click v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2016
  4. Cruz 164127 v. ThornellDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
  5. State of Arizona v. valencia/healerArizona Supreme Court · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API