Goldberg v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TIM TAFT, Justice.
Appellant, Daniel Goldberg, appeals from a final judgment dismissing his suit for want of subject-matter jurisdiction upon the plea to the jurisdiction of appel-lees, the Commission for Lawyer Discipline (“the Commission”) and the State Bar of Texas (“SBOT”) (together, “appel-lees”). We determine whether the trial court had subject-matter jurisdiction to declare (1) that the disciplinary judgment disbarring Goldberg was void because the final conviction underlying it had been set aside and (2) that his law license be restored. We also determine whether the trial court…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Bland Independent School District v. BlueTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-DavyTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- IKB Industries (Nigeria) Ltd. v. Pro-Line Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Schmitz v. Denton Cnty. Cowboy ChurchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Robert Morris v. Mike McAllesterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Latasha Freeman v. American K-9 Detection Services, L.L.C. and Hill Country Dog Center, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Goldberg v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
- In Re State Bar of Texas v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2023
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.