Legal Opinion

McIntosh v. Dill

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 7, 1922No. 11865PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Error from District Court, Okfuskee County; Lucien B. Wright, Judge. Action in ejectment by Mildred McIntosh against W. I-I. and M, E. Dill. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtElting., J.

This is an action in ejectment tried on an agreed statement of facts in the district court of Okfuskee county. A jury was waived. Judgment by the court was rendered in favor of the defendants in error, and the plaintiff' below, plaintiff in error herein, has appealed. The parties herein will be designated as plaintiff and defendants, as in the trial court.

The plaintiff is a three-fourths Creek Indian by blood, and is an allottee of the Creek Nation, and the land for which she sues is a part of her surplus allotment and described as follows: The north half of the southeast quarter of section…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Edye v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Choate v. TrappSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Wilkinson v. LelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  4. Curtis and Others v. . LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  5. Stephens v. Cherokee NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1899

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Sweezer v. GreenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  2. In Re Baby Girl L.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  3. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ETC. v. SeberCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  4. Johnson v. FurchtbarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. J. L. v. ParhamDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1976

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API