Legal Opinion

United States v. Printy

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 2006No. 100232 RelPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Karmeier

Chief Justice Thomas and Justices McMorrow, Fitzgerald, and Kilbride concurred in the judgment and opinion.

Justice Freeman concurred in part and dissented in part, with opinion.

Justice Garman took no part in the decision.

OPINION

Floyd W. Funk was a truck driver. He died January 7, 1983, leaving a will; a widow; four children, including a minor son; a modest life insurance policy, and interests in farmland, crops and equipment heavily encumbered by loans from the Farmers Home Administration (FmHA), an agency of the United States government. Funk’s will named his widow, Patsy Printy, as…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Belleville Toyota, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Material Service Corp. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Land v. Board of Educ. of City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Carpetland U.S.A., Inc. v. Illinois Department of Employment SecurityIllinois Supreme Court · 2002

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Estate of FunkIllinois Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API