Legal Opinion

In re AM. V.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 10, 2003No. Nos. 01-FS-211, 01-FS-212, 01-FS-213PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

These consolidated appeals arise from three orders in which the trial court determined that three children were neglected, as that term is defined in D.C.Code § 16-2801(B) and (C) (2001).1 After the court’s initial determination of neglect, the mother (appellant P.V.) retained custody of all three children. A short time later, however, the children were removed from appellant’s custody after it became known that she had not completed certain court-ordered parenting classes and that she had resumed her use of illegal drugs. After a final disposition hearing, the children…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. In re T.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Petition of DISDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. In re D.R.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re Petition of R.E.S.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. In re L.H.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. In Re LHDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. In Re RESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. In re Ang.P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API