In re AM. V.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
These consolidated appeals arise from three orders in which the trial court determined that three children were neglected, as that term is defined in D.C.Code § 16-2801(B) and (C) (2001).1 After the court’s initial determination of neglect, the mother (appellant P.V.) retained custody of all three children. A short time later, however, the children were removed from appellant’s custody after it became known that she had not completed certain court-ordered parenting classes and that she had resumed her use of illegal drugs. After a final disposition hearing, the children…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- In re T.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Petition of DISDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- In re D.R.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Petition of R.E.S.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In re L.H.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re LHDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re RESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In re Ang.P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013