Legal Opinion
Mauro John Montana v. William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 26, 1960No. 12851_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HASTINGS, Chief Judge.
This declaratory judgment action was brought in the district court under the provisions of Section 360 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, 8 U.S.C.A. § 1503. Mauro John Montana, plaintiff-appellant (plaintiff), initiated this suit to determine his citizenship, a controversy having been precipitated by an administrative order for his deportation. William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United States, is defendantappellee.
The facts of the case are simple and not in dispute — plaintiff was born in Italy in 1906, the son of an alien father and a citizen…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Wong Kim ArkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Dos Reis Ex Rel. Camara v. NicollsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1947
- Podea v. Acheson, Secretary of State of United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Weedin v. Chin BowSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Lee Hon Lung v. John Foster Dulles, Secretary of State of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Montana v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Claude Cartier v. Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Abele v. MarkleDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1972
- Byrn v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.