Legal Opinion
Canadian St. Regis v. State of New York
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided March 7, 2025No. 5:82-cv-00783Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK THE CANADIAN ST. REGIS BAND OF MOHAWK INDIANS, et. al., Plaintiffs, -against- 5:82-CV-783 (Lead) 5:82-CV-1114 (Member) STATE OF NEW YORK, et al., 5:89-CV-829 (Member) (LEK/TWD) Defendants. DECISION AND ORDER On May 30, 2024, Hattie Hart (“Movant”) filed a motion to intervene. Dkt. No. 898 (“Motion”). The parties to this action oppose the Motion. Dkt. Nos. 899, 902, 903, 909. For the reasons that follow, the Motion is denied. Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows for intervention as of right and intervention by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Pitney Bowes, Inc., Edo Corporation Plessey, Inc. Vernitron Corp., Baii Banking Corp., Movant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Floyd v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Farmland Dairies v. Commissioner Of The New York State Department Of Agriculture And MarketsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- In Re Bank of New York Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001