Legal Opinion
Noel v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided December 4, 2017No. A143026PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStreeter, J.
*1320Plaintiff James A. Noel bought an inflatable swimming pool at defendants' drugstore that turned out to be much smaller than the pool pictured on the box. He sued defendant Thrifty Payless, Inc. on behalf of himself and similarly situated individuals, alleging defendants violated the *1321Consumers Legal Remedies Act ( Civ. Code, § 1750 et seq. ) (CLRA), Unfair Competition Law ( Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq. ) (UCL), and False Advertising Law ( Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17500 ) (FAL) by selling the pool with deceptive advertising to consumers in its California retail stores. When Noel moved to…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Noel v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2019
- Justin Lytle v. Nutramax Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Justin Lytle v. Nutramax Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024