Legal Opinion
Matter of Di Bari v. Reilly
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 26, 1949PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
Upon this appeal the single question for our decision is whether the coverage of a workmen’s compensation insurance policy issued by the appellant insurance carrier extends to work being done by the claimant respondent at the location where his injuries occurred.
For a period of thirteen years prior to the date of the accident which befell the claimant, the respondent Reilly — to whom reference will be made as the employer — had operated a bar and grill in a building which he leased at 1103 Manhattan Avenue in Brooklyn. When the lease expired in March, 1945, he continued in possession of those…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of Pettit v. RegesNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Claim of Davis v. Block & Smith, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Matter of Lent v. 850 Seventh Avenue CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Claim of Schultz v. E. W. & W. D. AllansonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Matter of Schultz v. Allanson, Sun Indemnity Co., N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
3Cited by9 opinions
- Aragona v. Karl's K. K. Trade Shop, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Claim of Blenner v. Joseph Landis, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950
- Claim of Ginsberg v. Hollywood Luggage Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949
- Claim of Scammell v. Deleece Pastries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- Claim of Vissa v. WilliamsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.