Legal Opinion
Claim of Davis v. Block & Smith, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 2, 1947PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConway, J.
The question presented for our determination on this" appeal by the insurance carrier only, the employer having failed to appeal, is whether the policy which is a standard New York workmen’s compensation policy covered the work at the location where claimant’s injury occurred.
The claimant was employed by Block & Smith, Inc., as a handy man doing painting, repairing and plumbing work. The insurance policy provided for. the character of the work to be done and the locations at which that work was to be performed. At the time of his injury the claimant was not at any of the locations specified…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of Pettit v. RegesNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Claim of Jaabeck v. Theodore A. Crane's Sons Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Claim of MacDonald v. Grand Battery & Ignition ServiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Matter of Lent v. 850 Seventh Avenue CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Matter of Collier v. DangardNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Matter of Di Bari v. ReillyNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Coppotelli v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1980
- Commissioners of State Insurance Fund v. Photocircuits Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Claim of Blenner v. Joseph Landis, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950
- Claim of Scammell v. Deleece Pastries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.