Legal Opinion

KARABATAK v. United States

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided July 14, 2025No. 2:22-cv-06702Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY IBRAHIM KARABATAK, Petitioner, Civ. Action No. 22-6702 (JXN) Vv. OPINION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. NEALS, District Judge Before the Court is pro se petitioner Ibrahim Karabatak’s (“Petitioner”) amended motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2255

(“Amended Motion”). (ECF No. 6.) Following an order to answer, Respondent filed a response to the Amended Motion. (ECF No, 20.) For the reasons set forth below, Petitioner’s Amended Motion is DENIED, and the Court will not issue a certificate of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API