Legal Opinion
Kipp v. Sweno
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 24, 2004No. CX-03-140PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILBERT, Justice.
This is a case of first impression regarding Minn.Stat. § 510.02 (2002), which establishes a monetary value limitation to the homestead exemption. Appellant Thomas Sweno was found guilty of fraud after ceasing to work on a construction property that he agreed to build for respondents. A judgment was entered against appellant. Pursuant to this judgment, appellant was served with a notice of a sheriffs execution sale of his personal real estate property that was owned in joint tenancy with his spouse. Appellant served and filed a certificate of ownership and designation…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Denzer v. PrendergastSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Thiede v. Town of Scandia ValleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Hendrickson v. Minneapolis Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Ann H. O'Hagan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Steele v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1856
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Drenttel v. Jensen-Carter (In Re Drenttel)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Malloy v. BehrensNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- Running v. Dolan (In re Goodspeed)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
- Christensen Law Office, PLLC v. OleanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
- In Re EngstromUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.