Legal Opinion

Edgens v. Gaffney Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 13, 1904PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Before Gage, J., Cherokee, March, 1904. Action by Charles Edgens against Gaffney Mfg. Co. From order of nonsuit, plaintiff appeals. cites: 18 S. C., 279; 157 Mass., 564; 35 S. C., 408; 166 N. Y., 188; 52 L. R. A., 924; 87 Mo., 550 ; 63 la., 394; 41 Neb., 9. cites: 66 S. C., 256; 113 Mass., 544; 139 N. Y., 302; 20 Ency., 2 ed., 86, 87.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods.

The plaintiff, as an employee of defendant, was working in the bottom of a well. While so engaged he was struck and injured by a piece of pipe which became uncoupled and fell from the apparatus used to force water out of the well. This action for damages is founded on the charge of negligence on the part of the defendant in furnishing defective and unsafe machinery. The Circuit Judge held that there was a total failure to support the charge by evidence, and granted a nonsuit.

No evidence, either direct or circumstantial, was offered…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Graham v. BadgerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  4. Gentry v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Steele v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
  2. Holmes v. Davis, Dir. Gen.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  3. National Biscuit Co. v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Herbert v. ParhamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
  5. Turner v. Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API