Legal Opinion

Uhlig v. Berge Ford, Inc.

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided April 15, 2003No. 2:02-cv-02264Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HOLLAND, District Judge.

Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment

Defendant moves for summary judgment. 1 This motion is opposed, and plaintiff cross-moves for summary judgment. 2 Plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment is opposed. 3 Oral argument was requested and has been heard.

Facts

Plaintiff Susan R. Uhlig purchased a 2001 Ford Windstar from defendant Berge Ford, Inc., on February 4, 2001. The total purchase price of the Windstar, including taxes and fees, was $28,700.00. Plaintiff was given $6000.00 for her trade-in and assigned a $1,000.00 “customer cash incentive” to defendant toward…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. The Fair Housing Council Of Riverside County, Inc. v. Riverside TwoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Estiverne v. Sak's Fifth AvenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API