Legal Opinion · Dissent

Holstein v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 19, 1986No. C9-86-611Published

1DissentFoley, Judge

I respectfully dissent and cite People v. Ingle 36 N.Y.2d 413, 330 N.E.2d 39, 369 N.Y.S.2d 67 (1975). In Marben v. State, Department of Public Safety, 294 N.W.2d 697 (Minn.1980), the Minnesota Supreme Court quoted from Ingle as follows:

It should be emphasized that the factual basis required to support a stop for a “routine traffic check” is minimal. An actual violation of the Vehicle and Traffic Law need not be detectable. For example, an automobile in a general state of dilapidation might properly arouse suspicion of equipment violations. All that is required is that the stop be not the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. People v. IngleNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Marben v. State, Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. State v. McKinleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. State v. McKinleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API