Legal Opinion

Tavarez v. Extract Labs Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 18, 2024No. 1:21-cv-09916Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VICTORIANO TAVAREZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 21-CV-9916 (JPO) Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER -v- EXTRACT LABS, INC., Defendant. J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: Plaintiff Victoriano Tavarez (“Tavarez”) brought a putative class action lawsuit against Defendant Extract Labs, Inc. (“Extract”) under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and New York City law, asserting that Extract’s website was unlawfully inaccessible to the visually impaired. The Court granted a motion to dismiss filed by Extract.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Carter v. HealthPort Technologies, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  4. CRST Van Expedited, Inc. v. Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Patricia Cosgrove v. Sears, Roebuck, & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API