Legal Opinion

United States v. Samuel Constanza Alvarado

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 13, 2006No. 04-4969PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed in part; vacated and remanded in part by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Judge KING joined.

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge.

The instant case touches upon the sovereign authority of the state and federal governments to create and enforce criminal laws. The Commonwealth of Virginia charged defendant with state drug offenses, provided him with counsel, and subsequently dismissed the charges against him. After filing a federal criminal complaint, federal investigators gave defendant appropriate Miranda warnings and then questioned him outside the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  5. Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. United States v. BoskicCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  2. In re: Courtney WildCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
  3. United States v. Ryan HolnessCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. Rodney WilliamsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  5. John Turner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API