Legal Opinion

Shanghai Jinko Green Energy Enterprise Management Co., Ltd. v. Abalance Corporation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 28, 2025No. 3:24-cv-08828Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SHANGHAI JINKO GREEN ENERGY Case No. 24-cv-08828-JSC ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT CO., 8 LTD., et al., ORDER RE DEFENDANT WWB 9 Plaintiffs, CORP.’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION 10 v. & FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM 11 ABALANCE CORPORATION, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 44 Defendants. 12 13 14 Plaintiffs sue Defendants for infringing their U.S. Patents 11,581,454 (the ‘454 Patent) and 15 11,824,136 (the ‘136 Patent). (Dkt. No. 37.)1 Now before the Court is Defendant WWB 16 Corporation’s (“WWB”) motion to dismiss the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 2021
  5. Mavrix Photo, Inc. v. Brand Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API