Legal Opinion

Moore v. Brannin

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1929No. 3168PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WATSON, J.

The judgment in this cause was rendered upon findings of fact and conclusions of law. No exceptions of any kind were taken. So the findings cannot be reviewed. Stumpf v. Pohle, 28 N. M. 606, 216 P. 498. If any errors of law were committed, appellant has failed to indicate in what manner the attention of the trial court was called to such errors or different rulings invoked.

“The complaining party must fully advise the trial court of his theory of the law or facts, so that the court may be able to rule intelligently, and the party in the trial court receive the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Garcia v. SilvaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Stumpf v. PohleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
  3. McKinley County Abstract & Investment Co. v. ShawNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. N. H. Ranch Co. v. GannNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Chapel v. NevittNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Thomas v. JohnsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Torres v. ThompsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API