Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Maney

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1928No. 4872PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BABCOCK, Commissioner.

This action was brought by the respondents on April 17, 1924, to recover from appellants the penalty in a certain bond for $25,000 given to the respondents by the appellants, Maney Brothers & Company, a copartnership, as principal, and the appellant, Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland, a corporation, as surety, guaranteeing the performance on the part of the appellant copartnership of certain provisions of a contract made between the respondents and the said copartnership on June 7, 1913.

The contract recites that the respondents agreed to sell and convey to Maney…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Keyes v. NimsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. National Surety Co. v. WinslowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. Beckwith v. SheldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Griffiths v. Von HerbergWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Brown v. FosterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brenner v. PlittCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
  2. Moon v. ErvinIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
  3. King v. Riverside Alfalfa Growers' Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API