Hagen v. Bailus
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely
delivered the opinion of the court.
Plaintiff while riding as a passenger in an automobile owned and driven by defendant Fred Geek, was injured through a collision with another automobile at a road intersection; she brought suit, against Geek and George and Clarence Bailus, the owner and driver, respectively, of the other automobile. Upon trial the court instructed the jury to find George and Clarence Bailus not guilty, and from the judgment on the verdict to this effect plaintiff appeals.
The trial court was of the opinion that the evidence failed to show that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dee v. City of PeruIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
- Opp v. PryorIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
- Jeneary v. Chicago & Interurban Traction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1923
- Lerette v. Director General of RailroadsIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
- Pienta v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Zank v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
- Bliss v. KnappAppellate Court of Illinois · 1947
- Smith v. PolukeyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
- Gillan v. Chicago North Shore & Milwaukee Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1954
- Smith v. CarterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.