Legal Opinion
People v. Hjelm
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 14, 1964No. Crim. 3460PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPARKS, J., pro tem. *
The grand jury of Sacramento County found and presented an indictment charging defendant-respondent Hjelm with having committed three counts of perjury and one of forgery. Defendant moved to set aside the indictment under Penal Code section 995. The motion was granted, and the state now appeals under Penal Code section 1238, subdivision 1 from the dismissal of count 2, perjury. It is conceded by the state that counts 1, 3 and 4 were properly dismissed.
The charge of perjury was based upon allegedly false answers given by defendant in the taking of a deposition upon oral…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- People v. AdamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Lorenson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Bompensiero v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Greenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bailey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Rosen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- People v. GriffiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Chavez v. Zapata Ocean Resources, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Collins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.