Legal Opinion

Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. Golightly

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 16, 1918No. 1030PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Writ of error; from Fulton. (See ante, 20.)

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

Golightly brought an equitable action against the railroad company. To the overruling of its general demurrer the defendant excepted. After the bill of exceptions had been signed and certified by the presiding judge, and after this court had acquired jurisdiction of the case, the plaintiff dismissed his case in the trial court, without the knowledge or consent of the defendant. Thereupon the defendant (plaintiff in error) filed a petition in this court, reciting the facts just stated, attaching satisfactory documentary proof, and representing that the- questions were moot because of said,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mott v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
  2. Christopher v. CrovattSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Marshall v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  2. Deaton v. DaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  3. Walden v. Whitney CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  4. City of Jackson v. HardySupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  5. Griffin v. Securities Investment Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API