Legal Opinion
Mott v. Hill
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided July 15, 1849No. 13PublishedCited by 7 opinions
A motion- was made to dismiss this writ of error, on the ground that from the bill of exceptions it appeared that, after the making of the several decisions by the Court in the trial below, which were' excepted to, the plaintiff below and plaintiff in error voluntarily dismissed his case.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court. —
Warner, J..
[1.] There is.no judgment of'the Court below to be affirmed or reversed. The plaintiff in the Court below, as he had the' right to do, voluntarily dismissed his case. The case of Van Wormer vs. The Mayor, &c. of Albany, (18 Wendell, 169,) cited in support of the motion to dismiss the writ of error, is in point-Let the writ of error be dismissed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Root v. StuyvesantNew York Supreme Court · 1837
3Cited by7 opinions
- Proctor & Gamble Co. v. Blakely Oil & Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. GolightlySupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Holloway v. DorseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Walden v. Whitney CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- City of Jackson v. HardySupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.