Connecticut Valley Homes of East Lyme, Inc. v. Bardsley
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
2Per curiam
This case came before the Supreme Court for oral argument on December 8, 2004, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not summarily be decided. After hearing the arguments of counsel and examining the memoranda filed by the parties, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown and proceed to decide the appeal at this time. The defendant, Raymond Bardsley (defendant, purchaser, or Raymond), appeals from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Connecticut Valley Homes of East Lyme, Inc. (plaintiff or…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Faerber v. CavanaghSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
- Serra v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
- Strzebinska v. JarySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1937
- Geloso v. KennySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by10 opinions
- Mathew M. Cote v. John AielloSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2016
- State v. DiPetrilloSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
- Management Capital, L.L.C. v. F.A.F., Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2019
- James H. Arnold v. Thomas L. Arnold, Jr., individually and in his capacity as Trustee of the Thomas L. Arnold Jr. TrustSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2018
- State v. SampsonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.