Legal Opinion

Huston v. Murrell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1927No. 20265. Department OnePublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action is based upon a promissory note. The trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law sustaining a recovery. Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $1,575, together with interest, costs and attorney’s fee, from which the defendant Virginia Murrell appeals.

The respondent opens her brief with a motion to strike the statement of facts, which must be sustained. The time within which to file the statement of facts began to run on May 27,1926. The statement of facts was filed July 26, 1926. At no time was there a stipulation extending the time and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crowley v. McDonoughWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Martin v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tremblay v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Potlatch Lumber Co. v. Ferry CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. State v. SherwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Wheeler v. S. Birch & Sons Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. In Re the Estate of RotterWashington Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API