Legal Opinion
Loewinger v. Stokes
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 30, 2009No. 06-CV-1077, 06-CV-1076PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRAMER, Associate Judge:
These appeals challenge an order of the Superior Court holding appellants in civil contempt for having filed a landlord and tenant suit for possession based on non payment of rent, even though a receiver had been appointed by the court to administer — and enforce — payment of rent by tenants of the rental property. In a thorough and scholarly opinion, Judge Kravitz found that Lanier Associates (the owner of the property) and its former lawyers had violated “the clear and unambiguous directives of the receivership order by prosecuting this nonpayment action,” and that…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- In Re Fidelity Mortgage Investors, Debtor. Fidelity Mortgage Investors, Applicant-Appellee v. Camelia Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Project B.A.S.I.C. v. KempCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- D.D. v. M.T.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Trans-Lux Radio City Corp. v. Service Parking Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Smeal Fire Apparatus Co. v. KreikemeierNebraska Supreme Court · 2010
- Lori A. Saxon . Todd D. Zirkle and Jane Khoury and Olivia BakerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Jacob Herring v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Ieasha Hipps v. Ruben CabreraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- C.C. v. G.D.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.